Aleksandra Puzyno I DYWIDAG Concrete Marketing Manager in DYWIDAG at DYWIDAG Concrete Technologies

5.0★

Mobile App Development Review from Aleksandra Puzyno I DYWIDAG Concrete

TekRevol did a great job with our app. They understood what we needed and finished everything on time. Working with them was easy and professional. I recommend them to anyone who wants a good app.

Sidra Ansari Brand Manager at Vitruvian Agency

4.3★

Web Development Review from Sidra Ansari

I recently collaborated with Tekrevol for the development and design of our marketing website, and the experience was outstanding. Their team showcased professionalism, creativity, and a deep understanding of web technologies. The communication was clear and effective, ensuring a smooth process from start to finish.The design and functionality of our website exceeded our expectations, making it not only visually appealing but also user-friendly and responsive across all devices. The project was delivered on time and within budget, reflecting Tekrevol's dedication to quality and client satisfaction.I highly recommend Tekrevol to anyone in need of top-quality web development and design services. Their expertise and customer-focused approach truly set them apart.

Sara Kraeski Marketing Manager at Lex Mundi

5.0★

Mobile App Development Review from Sara Kraeski

TekRevol created a design aimed at enhancing the website's accessibility, with the anticipation of boosting traffic and conversion rate.Their team representative effectively communicated clear timelines and objectives. Notably, they exceeded expectations and delivered exceptional application development services. Their excellent communication and responsiveness played a vital role in the project's success.

Alexandra Pomazan CMO at Mind Studios

5.0★

Software Development Review from Alexandra Pomazan

We collaborated with Uinno during the development of a portfolio risk management platform for a fintech product aimed at small and mid-sized businesses. While our team at Mind Studios led the overall implementation, we brought in Uinno as a specialized AI partner to handle the AI component and conduct a UX/UI audit. What stood out the most was their ability to translate complex AI models into practical, user-friendly features. Their commitment to explainability was key in earning the clients trust and driving adoption. They also played a valuable role in the pitching phase their AI expertise was truly impressive.

Sergii Kulikovskyi General Manager, Fan Engagement at Genius Sports

4.8★

Web Development Review from Sergii Kulikovskyi

Thanks to Uinno team, who has developed for us internal ERP tool, that 100% met our needs thanks to their detailed approach. These guys've spent countless hrs with me finding out every minor detail, to make sure they tailor the project to meet very difficult requirements, which though has driven price expectation to the higher end. However will be glad to work with Uinno team again on upcoming projects and use them as a service provider

Joshua J. Scott VP at AKA Identity

2.3★

Web Development Review from Joshua J. Scott

We've used Good Code in the past and had good satisfaction with the work. In this project, unfortunately we had a bad experience.The situation:1. We had a front end project that we wanted to get done externally because our internal devs were focused on other projects2. The project was fully taped out, high fidelity designs were complete, and the back end was finished prior3. GoodCode quoted 60 hours to complete the work, terms were agreed to and the project was scheduled4. The developer who was assigned was a new hire to GoodCode which gave some pause, but we had good experiences prior so we assumed it would be the same5. There were no updates sent to us as the project progressed6. Project went over the 60 hours with no notice until right before delivery that it exceeded the amount by 20+ hours7. The developer opened a 5,156 line PR with our team for delivery8. When we asked to break up the PR for easier review, was told we would have to pay for the hours to do so9. We refused to pay more given the project had already significantly exceeded the estimateWe tried to appeal that this service was unacceptable given how much we were paying per hour for Good Code expertise. They refused.While they were responsive and within a reasonable time frame of delivery, I was very disappointed in how this project turned out.

Helen Guzenko Partnership Manager at Wezom

5.0★

Startup Review from Helen Guzenko

Wezom is an enterprise software development company with more than 275 specialists. We brought RGray in for startup marketing and growth marketing for a FinTech SaaS platform we had built for a client, an early stage startup with a finished product and almost no market presence. RGray started with their startup marketing foundation: market and competitor research, positioning and messaging, and a growth strategy built on three prioritized hypotheses, each with its own funnel and success metrics. They then implemented the channels: SEO, GEO for visibility inside AI search and AI assistants, PR and digital media, and paid user acquisition to test the funnels fast. Analytics and attribution were in place from the start.They also built AI into the daily marketing work: a custom multi agent system using Claude, Grok, Perplexity and Gemini for research, content production and localization, handed over with workflows, prompts and checklists. Two of the three hypotheses proved out, so we elaborated those two and their funnels. CAC started at $31 and fell to $16 by the end of the test campaign, below the industry average. The campaign brought around 2,500 activated users, which boosted revenue and gave us real data for funnel, user and product analysis. The client finished with a working acquisition system and the documentation to run it, not a set of campaigns. Project management was on time and on budget: weekly calls, a shared board with owners and deadlines, monthly reporting against the strategy metrics, same day answers. When our client's roadmap moved, they resequenced the plan in days. Most impressive: they think like product owners, not like a service agency, and they challenged our ICP and pricing assumptions correctly. One improvement: the early reports were denser than we needed, and they added an executive summary once we asked.