Anna Edelshtein Head of Marketing at Real Estate Development

5.0 ★

Web Development Review from Anna Edelshtein

For our residential complex that was under construction at the time, we needed a strong representation website. As we prioritize an off-plan sales strategy, trust is everything, and a quality website is fundamental to gaining it. So we contacted AMgrade to implement our vision. And that was the right decision on our part! We were impressed with the level of process transparency and team efficiency, and had no headaches along the way. New website and this overall experience exceeded our expectations, so we totally recommend AMgrade.

Anna Tsema Head of PR and Marketing Department at Healthcare Clinic

5.0 ★

Software Development Review from Anna Tsema

As one of the goals, we were aiming to get a handpicked team to implement our vision and work with further, but, as a key deliverable, this time was a ready-to-use, polished system for our clinic (Including complex integrations with DocDream). We totally achieved both with AMgrade! Their smooth work plan and processes worked like a charm. We didnt have to spend a lot of time on control and task management (which was our biggest concern), only actively participate in the first planning stage!

Roman Kofanov Co-Founder at AllWed

5.0 ★

Web Development Review from Roman Kofanov

Simply put, the main deliverables we defined for AMgrade were an efficient team and a platform where wedding vendors (photographers, drivers, DJs, etc.) could list their services, and boost them for more clients to see. Thanks to the AMgrades expertise and guidance we not only have the platform up and running the way we anticipated, efficient tech team but also remain high in the Google Ranking. So we continue our cooperation with maintenance!

Martin Tóth CEO at OBS Slovakia s.r.o.

1.0 ★

Branding Review from Martin Tóth

We signed a contract with Loova Studio (Lenka Loová) on April 30, 2025, for full branding delivery (logo, visual identity, brand book). What actually happened: Only partial outputs (research, strategy, moodboards) were delivered, and these did not reflect our assignment or the repeatedly provided feedback. Key requirements defined in the briefing were ignored, the logo and final identity were never delivered. During a video call on June 9, 2025, the supplier admitted she did not know how to implement our vision and suggested ending the cooperation while keeping the initial payment. We filed a formal complaint on June 24-25, 2025, since the outputs were unusable and did not meet the contractual requirements. The complaint was not acknowledged. The contract was drafted unilaterally in favor of the supplier. Under her interpretation, she is entitled to payment even if the results are not in line with the assignment and cannot be used by the client. This means client satisfaction and usability of the results are irrelevant. Financial impact: we paid an advance of 1,035 EUR. The supplier kept 869.40 EUR for partial phases. We considered it fair to leave her 250-300 for the work done, but this was rejected. In the end, only 165.60 EUR was refunded. After almost two months (around 35-40 working days), no usable branding was delivered, and a new designer had to start from scratch. The cooperation ended with no tangible results, a rejected complaint, and a contract that allowed the supplier to keep most of the advance regardless of outcome. We do not recommend working with this studio and with Ms. Lenka Loová. Martin Tóth, CEO www.pikMenu.com